The news this week that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's supporters in Gujarat had built a temple dedicated to him led to many eyebrows being raised, apart of course from the usual hilarity on Twitter.
No one quite paid attention to the small detail in the report that a pre-existing smaller temple had been upgraded to a grand building, where a small photograph of Modi was replaced with a large bust.
That the news followed in the wake of the poll debacle in Delhi perhaps added to the schadenfreude. Cartoonists were quick off the block.
It was, of course, forgotten that stories about similar Modi temples have done the rounds for some time now.
That the news came fresh on the heels of the controversy over a Rs 10 lakh suit, which had pinstripes embroidered with the name Narendra Damodardas Modi repeated over and over again, only added more grist to the mills.
The man who has been criticised for remaining silent on a range of issues, seems to have suddenly decided to respond with a sense of urgency, as three successive tweets followed on Thursday morning:
But instead of silencing his critics, these tweets led to more questions. On his silence at news of other temples:
And his earlier silence at temples being built specifically by his fans:
And then it turned out that the temple dedicated to Modi had apparently been constructed illegally by a tea stall owner, Shankar Patel, with the help of a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) member, Ramesh Unghad, to ward off action for encroaching on government land.
The story about how government land ended up as a temple might sound familiar, but it is worth sharing, as reported by the Mumbai Mirror, quoting one of Patel's friends:
But, as the news became national and the prime minister felt compelled to express his disapproval on Twitter, the Rajkot administration finally moved in and razed the structure to the ground.
With the planned inauguration by a Gujarat minister cancelled, the temple razed, and the living deity redeemed, Twitter went back to being itself, with questions and whataboutism on Sonia Mata:
No one quite paid attention to the small detail in the report that a pre-existing smaller temple had been upgraded to a grand building, where a small photograph of Modi was replaced with a large bust.
That the news followed in the wake of the poll debacle in Delhi perhaps added to the schadenfreude. Cartoonists were quick off the block.
Top BJP leadership introspects after Delhi debacle. My #cartoon pic.twitter.com/KJONNiKBQX
— MANJUL (@MANJULtoons) February 12, 2015
It was, of course, forgotten that stories about similar Modi temples have done the rounds for some time now.
That the news came fresh on the heels of the controversy over a Rs 10 lakh suit, which had pinstripes embroidered with the name Narendra Damodardas Modi repeated over and over again, only added more grist to the mills.
@dhanyarajendran The cost of Modi suit (Kutty Cartoon) http://t.co/c8Ea1VgXlP
— Jasoos Kutty (@JasoosKutty) February 10, 2015
Cannot resist sharing this one. Too darn funny @gsurya @nesoron @rachitseth @AMadumoole @anandhalve @AnandKochukudy pic.twitter.com/aqwjUOL36K
— Give ☮ a chance (@nandtara) February 12, 2015
The man who has been criticised for remaining silent on a range of issues, seems to have suddenly decided to respond with a sense of urgency, as three successive tweets followed on Thursday morning:
Have seen the news about a Temple being built in my name. I was appalled. This is shocking & against India's great traditions.
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) February 12, 2015
Building such Temples is not what our culture teaches us. Personally, it made me very sad. Would urge those doing it not to do it.
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) February 12, 2015
If you have time & resources, please devote the same towards fulfilling our dream of a Clean India.
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) February 12, 2015
But instead of silencing his critics, these tweets led to more questions. On his silence at news of other temples:
.@narendramodi wish you had also spoken out against 'Godse Temples' being erected by elements of Sangh Pariwar
— Pawan Khera (@Pawankhera) February 12, 2015
And his earlier silence at temples being built specifically by his fans:
Did Modi ji object to this temple too, a year back? pic.twitter.com/sk8zb7OvS3
— ✌स्वराज✌ (@VPra52) February 12, 2015
There are over 4 temples in India named after him.Why did #Modi not object at temples dedicated to him in UP or South before the #AAPSweep ?
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
Why is PM Modi appalled?Temple has a new bigger idol now. Otherwise temple was built in 2006 when he was Gujarat CM. #AAPSweep responsible?
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
Ramesh Undhad who runs Namo Mandir since 2006 at same place now asked2 keep quiet.He is confused why is Modi & BJP suddenly disowning him?
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
Ramesh undhad who runs the Modi temple is just installing a new idol.temple had been functional since 2006. http://t.co/jhizDo6NNn
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
My question is if the temple is since 2006 why is Modi shocked in 2015? Did he not know about it? http://t.co/KXbcH0RCly
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
A BJP leader says mayb Modi Saheb didnt know there was a temple dedicated 2him in Gujarat since 06.Modi was Guj CM frm Oct 2001 to May 2015.
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
#AAPSweep & @ArvindKejriwal responsible for PM Modi to express shock at temple dedicated to him?
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
The cynic in me says modi knows the damage done by 10 lakh suit hence displaying humility on temple issue. Anyway brilliant political ploy.
— Je Suis Bazaaru (@brownbrumby) February 12, 2015
Our country has MGR Amitabh Sonia Modi etc temples.but this sudden shock by PM appeared more like reaction to #AAPSweep than humility
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
whoever advised PM Modi 2express shock at temple built in 2006 got it wrong.Hope is not the same person who advised him to wear tht suit!
— deepal trivedi (@DeepalTrevedie) February 12, 2015
See @sabeaux . Was built last year and reported by media then. Didn't see Modiji object. You are bang on about PR https://t.co/PR3gm91yEU
— Mr.Wallflower (@xtahzy) February 12, 2015
And then it turned out that the temple dedicated to Modi had apparently been constructed illegally by a tea stall owner, Shankar Patel, with the help of a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) member, Ramesh Unghad, to ward off action for encroaching on government land.
The story about how government land ended up as a temple might sound familiar, but it is worth sharing, as reported by the Mumbai Mirror, quoting one of Patel's friends:
"Constant fear of demolition bothered him [Patel]. So, he first put up a picture of Bharat Maata. But that did not solve his problems. Meanwhile, Narendra Modi became the CM of Gujarat. He was a Modi fan since the CM had contested his first election from Gujarat. So, he put up a picture of Modi saheb"
Harassment from local officials reportedly decreased. Soon, along with Aum Paan Centre, Patel opened the Momai Tea Centre. He lived behind these kiosks. As his business began to prosper, he befriended Unghad, a small time property dealer and a primary member of the BJP. Both of them planned to "expand" the temple.
Together, and mostly with financial help from Unghad, they constructed a small temple and began to offer prayers to Modi. Twice a day, Patel performed a Modi puja and chanted Modi hymns. He does not remember when he first started worshipping Modi, but he says that he came up with the temple at least "eight to nine years ago".
But, as the news became national and the prime minister felt compelled to express his disapproval on Twitter, the Rajkot administration finally moved in and razed the structure to the ground.
With the planned inauguration by a Gujarat minister cancelled, the temple razed, and the living deity redeemed, Twitter went back to being itself, with questions and whataboutism on Sonia Mata:
RT ggiittiikkaa: While PM Modi rejected "his" temple, Sonia Mata had no issues with "her" temple. Neither her lapd… pic.twitter.com/O8fXYgHkkv
— ChaiPeCharcha (@Chai_pe_Charcha) February 12, 2015
Limited-time offer: Big stories, small price. Keep independent media alive. Become a Scroll member today!
Our journalism is for everyone. But you can get special privileges by buying an annual Scroll Membership. Sign up today!